TEXTUAL NOTES
I.2 them;
coreptionem,
2.5 soares yet
III.7 they
III.10 may iustifie also there em
IV.1 evidence
IV.4 Christe (this mistake occurs repeatedly, probably by misinterpretation of an abbreviation)
IV.4. Mr Jewells pte
IV.10 effortes
V.1 evo
V.5 feddes
V.6 mens
V.6 treage
VI.3 one
VI.4 call
VI.4 paradone
VI.4 this spelling is also found at X.4
VI.6 Church
VI.6 deciples
VI.7 thinge
VI.7 there is
VI.7 By
VI.9 propretise
VI.9 if so be it marked
VII.1 Thimothy
VII.4 Christ
VII.5 the
VII.9 no
VIII.4 at this point the Latin text breaks off
VIII.5 knowledge
VIII.5 Luter
VIII.6 Queenes
VIII.8 thes
VIII.10 Lordshopp
VIII.11 bringin
VIII.11 Epiphamus
VIII.11 agane
IX.1 Christ
IX.3 should we read conveienc (i. e., conveyance)?
IX.4 thes
IX.4 this
IX.4 meditation
IX.7 meane
IX.7 read incorporated?
IX.7 pointe
X.3 pardoxes
X.3 extell
X.3 the
X.7 Si
X.7 scourted
X.8 redicously
X.9 denynded
X.9 reging
XI.1 sermon
XI.2 he mean
XI.2 whether
XI.3 stories
XI.3 the transcript has refraine corrected from restraine, but restraine appears more suitable for the context
XI.5 leave
XII.4 end
XII.7 forme
XII.14 that is
XII.14 the transcript has thes corrected to ther, but thes is clearly preferable
XII.15 rather regrettably, the word sheepidy is not in the O. E. E., this may be a corruption such as sheeplyke stupidity
XII.18 Atheismes
XII.19 Christ
XII.23 ore else with put workes
XIII.5 Christ
XIII.5 Bishope
XIII.5 this word is barely legible in the transcript
XIII.6 read and?
XIII.6 though
XIII.8 exactines
XIII.9 que